WORK IN PROGRESS
Directed search on the marriage market
In this study, a static two-sided directed search model is applied to the marriage market to unravel male and female preferences over partner characteristics and terms of marriage given observed matches. The model takes into consideration the trade-off individuals face when searching for a partner, balancing between partner characteristics, terms of marriage, and matching probability. By using data from the ACS 5-year PUMS dataset (2015-2019), the study will estimate this equilibrium search-and-matching model and derive identifying power from variation in gender ratios across US regions. A unique aspect of this study is the incorporation of the collective household model literature by defining the terms of marriage as the distribution of bargaining power in the next relationship. Counterfactual analyses will also be conducted to examine the impact of exogenously changing the gender ratio on individuals’ searching behavior.
Consideration sets on the marriage market
This paper integrates the notion of consideration sets in the revealed preference framework of Cherchye, Demuynck, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2017). Using a revealed preference methodology based on the assumption of marriage stability within the collective household model, this framework can identify the intrahousehold decision structure, such as the sharing rule. Based on this methodology, a comparative study is conducted across various marriage market specifications, which include: (1) the conservative approach, where only someone's current partner is considered; (2) the Choo and Siow (2006) approach, where everyone considers everyone; (3) the Cherchye et al. (2017) approach, where potential partners are considered based solely on age; and (4) six other categories (BMI, values, wage, education, children, and religiosity). These categories are selected based on data availability and the assortative mating literature. The specifications are evaluated using goodness-of-fit indicators, the marriage market size, and the tightness of the sharing rule bounds to investigate the bias-precision trade-off.
Multidimensional vulnerability and intrahousehold inequality with Maria Popova (Brunel University)
Legal Cohabitation, Household Insurance, and Female Labor Supply with Valeria Cordova Silveira (KU Leuven) and Gastón P. Fernández (KU Leuven)